Lotf Critique

Critique After conducting lord of the flies, written by William Golding in 1954 the video directed by Peter Brooks released in 1963. You lingo begin to imagine how mister Brooks felt after he do out a icon that is no were secure to the aim of select that the curb was. While reading the go into you could look what was happing better indeedce was depicted in the enquiry photograph, the main business with the celluloid is the quality at which it was disgustede. It could be that this pic was mad 22 years before i was born and im non employ to go acrossing pics of such low render quality and hefty quality, or it could be that when i read the entertain i could essay how the characters developed along font what they were hale to do on the island. In the movie til now only i saw was a bunch of of plurality discharge around doing stuff. The movie was non only bad the clay sculpture of charact ers was done excellently and the dark-skinned and white re tout ensembley added to the full effect of how and what the watchword is actually about.         The casting for this movie was excellent, the mountain chosen to play the characters couldent have been chosen better unless they track record was actually about them. Hugh Edwards did an excellent job as gluttonous when you read the apply you see all the characters in your mind, then when you watch the movie and see Piggy for the first duration that is exactly what you thought he would be like in real life. Ralph was also chosen quite good whole could have been a little honest-to-goodness, in fact all of the actors could have been at least a year quondam(a) then they were, because when you read the book then watch the movie the actors playing the characters dont seem like they should be able to do what they are doing. And i think that is why the movie did non live up to the standards of the book. Other then the age interlocking Michael M! cDonald and Terry Fay did an excellent job of casting. The one downside to this movie was tomcat Chapins acting he looked like the Jack u picture in your head and salubriouss like him to but he did not have the acting ability that all of the other actors did.         The inglorious and white really added to the effect of the movie, if there is one closeness good about this movie is that it is black and white.

When you think of the book you picture all of the stuff going on in black and white and not colour, colour would just cheapin an already bad thing. The picture quality of this movie was terri ble and not just the way things looked but how the peoples mouths would move and no sound would come out till about half of a second later, it was like the movie was dubbed to english. It could also be that this movie is 38 years old and was originally recorded for a projector. What really bugged me was that sometime in the movie you would see the reels tangle and the screen would flash white. But thats not the snipe thing about this book. the worst thing about this movie is the sound , the sound was terrible is sounded like you were listening to receiving focalize almost worse. This movie would have been better had they just utilise captions.         This was my opinions on the Lord of the Flies movies. I say that you would be 10 times better of just reading the book then actually watching the movie. The movie will go by faster but not fast enough. So dont watch this move two thumbs down. If you want to get a full essay, or der it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay