Twelve Angry Men

Introduction:         The movie Twelve Angry Men involves central men, all(a) of different ages, chosen for gore duty. Their case, a young son accused of killing his father. The jurors had to reach a unanimous decisiveness based on whether the male child was unacquainted(p) or nefarious of murder. The xii men were placed in a mild jury room, located inside the tourist court, where it was very warm because of the brave egress outside. Upon entering the room, each jury member was seated clownish a rectangular table according to his jury lambaste along in the courtroom.         At first, only one gay erect the son innocent of the crime. Others immediately thought the boy was delinquent after listening to the severalise in the court. The cosmos who stood bottom the boy entirely gave his reasoning to how the boy could not beat committed this crime. Soon after that, another make was interpreted and other men started to join the fi rst shout in his reasoning. The men continued to state and argue their thoughts almost the evidence concerning the case. This, what the men thought would take only a brusk period of duration, went on for numerous hours.         Each time more(prenominal) evidence was discussed and opinions were stated, another bal mount was taken to see where the twelve men stood.

On every occasion, the numbers changed, adding another vote to the innocent side. Finally, towards the end of the movie, the first guy was able to sum over all the other jury members that the boy was then innocent. It took a long tim e, a lot of patience, and a lot of sway of ! their positions to arrive at the final decision that they walked into the courtroom with. whole twelve jurors reached a unanimous decision, finding the boy innocent of killing his deadbeat dad. Critical Analysis:         The negotiation... If you motive to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay